FCC’s Proposed Change Could Raise Phone Taxes

Americans are speaking out against a proposal by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that could raise millions of people’s phone bills. The proposal by FCC Chairman Kevin Martin has to do with a tax called the Universal Service Fund (USF).

The USF tax was established to help ensure that low-income and rural consumers have access to affordable phone services. Currently, USF money is collected on a “pay-for-what-you-use” system; a tax based on how much interstate long distance a person uses. The less a person uses long distance, the less he or she pays.

However, the FCC is proposing a monthly flat fee instead. The proposed monthly flat fee would apply to all phone numbers and other connections, regardless of how few interstate long-distance calls are made. That could raise taxes on 43 million U.S. households by more than $700 million.

Callers in California, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas and Virginia stand to be the biggest losers. Taxpayers in 10 of those 12 states-all but Texas and Minnesota-already pay more in federal USF taxes than their states get back for schools, hospitals and rural connectivity. Under the proposed FCC plan, that disparity would grow even wider. The most conservative estimate of the proposed plan-where the USF fee would shift from the current structure to a flat $1 fee, per phone line, per month-indicates that 11 of the 12 states would end up paying more into the USF than they currently do.

According to the Keep USF Fair Coalition, a consumer advocacy group, this USF proposal has grave implications for the future of telephone service nationwide. The proposed USF change also affects anyone who has friends or relatives in any of those 12 states, or does business with a person or company located there.

With low-income and elderly consumers already hit with high gas prices, higher home energy costs and continued inflation in medical prescriptions, the wide range of diverse groups in the Keep USF Fair Coalition is opposing the FCC’s proposed “number”-based plan. These groups caution against balancing USF finances on the backs of the very consumers whom they were intended to help.

Related posts

Filed under Tax Refunds by on #

Random Search Terms

council tax, Nys refund under review filed1/17 when will they update my status, should I charge my brother to do his taxes, Michigan Additions and Subtractions tax forms, how long does it take to get income tax refund from childsupport, wrong itin number in tax returns, instructions for completing irs form 1023, how long does it take for the state of ks to cash my check, 2011 nys tax refund hasn\t come yet, will tax refund checks be forwarded to new change of address, 2011first time homebuyers tax credit in il, state of al tax refunds 2011, federal income tax refund in arkansas, new york sales refund for tourists, has anyone gotten their tax refund 2011 when filed with the injured spouse form, meade tax services, where is my tax refund mailed from, when can i expect my georgia tax refund, Canada revenue tax return taking a long time, 2011 alabama tax refund issance dates, colorado state tax incentives for 2011, amt why recalculate 2009 return?, georgia taxes 2011 amended, when are illinois tax refunds mailed out, tax rebate china & internal consumption, when do i get my 2011 nc tax refund, in georgia do you have to file if you do not owe?, n c donde esta mi rembolso, prepare california state taxes for 2010, how long does a tax refund check take to clear, VAT refunds new york canadian travelers, tax refund status ny for tourist, anybody ga tax return still processing, georgia income tax form for 2010, how long does it take to get ex husband income tax in alabama, ca ftb refund deposits, someone else\s tax refund check, filing vat return online in kenya, state of georgia 2011 tax efund schedule, i have not received my CA state tax return 2011 We are unable to process your request, how many days refund tax, idaho tax refund delay, alabama income tax refund delay for 2010